Insurance Defense

Our Success Story
Serving and Located in Saugus, MA
781-233-2284
Serving and Located in Saugus, MA
Call Us Today

Choose an Aggressive Attorney

Experienced Insurance Defense Attorney

With 75 years of experience, the legal team at Flynn Peter E Attorney At Law PC is ready to assist you with any type of personal injury case. Look at some of our cases!

RIVERA v. COMEAU - Attorney Jason Scopa for the defendant - August 14, 2016
The decision for a defendant, who struck a pedestrian. Plaintiff testified to significant physical and injuries, multi-day admission to MGH, and more than $20,000 in medical bills. Zero damages awarded, as plaintiff found to be recklessly crossing the road.

ROSS v KING CAB COMPANY - Attorney Jason Scopa for the defendant - May 16, 2016
Jury verdict for defendant despite defendant admitting to fault in rear-ending the plaintiff. Plaintiff testified to significant physical and emotional injuries and submitted more than $100,000 in medical bills. Zero damages awarded.

DALTON v MCNAMARA - Attorney Jason Scopa for the defendant - March 2, 2015
Jury verdict for the defendant. Defendant rear-ended the plaintiff and caused significant property damage and defendant submitted $11,000 for medical expenses. However, defense verdict entered.

TORRES v. ARBELLA – December 14, 2012
The plaintiff sought six figures from her insurance company as a result of a hip fracture resulting from a fall from a moving vehicle. However, due to plaintiff’s intoxication, the arbitrator awarded zero damages.

MCCARREN v HEBERT – Attorney Jason Scopa for defense – June 19, 2012
Arbitrator awards plaintiff zero damages. Plaintiff submitted over $25,000 in medical bills relating to shoulder surgery after car accident. Plaintiff testified that defendant suddenly turned left into his car while plaintiff was legally passing in next lane. Defendant testified that plaintiff caused the accident while trying to cut in front of defendant. Arbitrator determined that defendant was not negligent. Plaintiff recovers nothing.

HAMILTON v. ARBELLA – December 14, 2011
Plaintiff sought significant high six figure damages for teeth and nose injuries suffered when struck by car. Arbitrator found damages totaling $125,000. However, with offsets, which included plaintiff's previous $100,000 settlement, net arbitration award was only $22,439.

FEENER v. WILLIS – May 26, 2011
Jury Verdict of only $7,435.30. Defendant admitted liability [negligence] for motor vehicle accident. Plaintiff submitted $55,000 in medical bills and alleged numerous injuries including concussion and post-traumatic stress disorder.

CAHILL v. CASSIDY – Attorney Jason Scopa for defendant – Judgment for defendant – December 21, 2010
Plaintiff police officer claimed that defendant made a false 911 call and that plaintiff suffered injury when he got in car accident while responding to the scene in his police cruiser. Plaintiff claimed personal injuries, medical expenses, and lost wages. Summary Judgment entered for defendant that made the allegedly phony 911 call. Plaintiff recovers nothing.

ROTBERG v. WELLWOOD – Attorney Jason Scopa for defense – Arbitrator awards plaintiff zero damages – October 6, 2010
Defendant was turning left across plaintiff's lane of travel and significant accident occurs. Both parties claim to have had green light. Plaintiff submits medical bills exceeding $14,000.00, but arbitrator determines that defendant was not negligent and enters decision for defendant.

JOHN DOE v. ARBELLA INSURANCE – October 5, 2010
Arbitrator awards only $69,060 to plaintiff seeking $249,000 in uninsured motorist benefits as a result of car accident with uninsured driver. Plaintiff asserted a permanent traumatic brain injury, which was disputed by Arbella. Arbella's expert neuropsychiatrist testified that the plaintiff sustained a minor traumatic brain injury that resolved without any residual disability.

TRIO v. FLAHERTY – Attorney Jason R. Scopa for defendant
Defendant stipulates to liability for rear-end accident on Route 128 exit ramp. Plaintiff submits medical bills exceeding $22,000.00, but arbitrator awards plaintiff less than $20,000 for damages based on defense counsel's evidence and argument that much of the treatment would have occurred anyway due to a previous car accident.

COHEN v. ASSIST MEDICAL TRANSPORT – May 12, 2009
Arbitrator awards only $59,400 to plaintiff seeking $155,000. Plaintiff sustained a head injury - left frontal lobe intraparenchymal hemorrhage - as a result of being dropped by the defendant's medical transport workers while en route to hospital. Defendant's medical expert testified that the plaintiff's head injury resolved without any residual disability, which was supported by plaintiff's own medical records.

ORTIZ v. ARBELLA MUTUAL INSURANCE CO. – Verdict for the defendant insurance company – November 21, 2008
Verdict for the defendant insurance company on November 21, 2008. The plaintiff sought six-figure damages plus attorney’s fees. The plaintiff alleged that the insurance company violated the consumer protection statute by failing to settle the plaintiff’s previous personal injury claim since liability in the first case was allegedly reasonably clear. The plaintiff also alleged that the insurer's investigation was below industry standards. Judge Kathe Tuttman ruled in favor of the defendant insurance company on all claims.

BRENNAN v. CIRCLE BOWL LLC – Jury verdict for the defendant – October 17, 2007
Plaintiff alleged that he slipped and fell on a broken piece of ceramic floor tile at the defendant’s bowling alley. Plaintiff sustained numerous injuries from the fall, including torn rotator cuff of right shoulder, requiring surgery. Plaintiff submitted medical bills of approximately $36,000.00. Jury found the defendant bowling alley not negligent and awarded zero damages.

DUBE v. LAMPHEAR – MA appeals court decision – June 21, 2007
Appeals court upheld superior court’s dismissal of the plaintiff’s complaint against attorney Murray’s client. Plaintiff sought to hold the defendant liable for an automobile accident because the defendant paid the group’s bar tab at a local restaurant. Appeals court refused to extend social host liability to the defendant.

ZOTO v. JIMMY'S ALLENHURST, INC. – Attorney Jason R. Scopa for the defendant – Jury verdict for the defendant – Plaintiff awarded zero damages – August 8, 2007
Plaintiff broke her wrist while at a reception at the defendant's restaurant. She produced photographs of the dance floor with flower petals she alleged the defendant's staff should have removed; and she alleged that she fell on the dance floor as a result of the defendant's negligence. The plaintiff testified to and submitted over $10,000 in special damages, including medical expenses and lost wages. Jury determined that the defendant was not negligent and thus did not consider the plaintiff's claimed damages.

NARBONNE v. PEABODY ROCKETS PARTNERS – Jury verdict for the defendant
– October 17, 2006
Plaintiff alleged that he slipped and fell on restaurant grease located on a sidewalk in front of Johnny Rockets Restaurant at the North Shore Mall in Peabody, MA. Plaintiff alleged numerous injuries, including torn rotator cuff of the left shoulder. Plaintiff submitted special damages of $12,000. Jury found the defendant restaurant not negligent and awarded zero damages.

DELEON v. ARBELLA MUTUAL INSURANCE CO. – Arbitration order for the defendant
– August 1, 2006
Plaintiff sustained serious head injuries from a car accident, including a left orbital fracture and a skull fracture. The plaintiff’s car struck a rock resulting in the plaintiff being ejected from his car. The plaintiff submitted medical bills of approximately $70,000. Plaintiff sought uninsured motorist benefits alleging that he was run off the road by a hit and run motorist. Arbitrator found that the accident was caused by the plaintiff racing another driver of a car. Arbitrator ruled for the defendant insurance company and awarded zero damages.

ELSIDIG v. SILVA & TOYOTO CREDIT CORP. – Attorney Jason R. Scopa for the defendants – Jury verdict for defendant – Plaintiff awarded zero damages –March 19, 2004.
Plaintiff alleged that she was the victim of a hit and run accident while a pedestrian. It was alleged that she was able to obtain the license plate of the fleeing vehicle and that it was later identified by the local police as owned and operated by the defendants. Defendant produced her co-workers to testify that she was not in the area of the alleged accident at the time in question. The plaintiff testified to and submitted nearly $10,000 in special damages. Jury determined that the defendant was not negligent and/or was not involved, and therefore the jury did not reach the issue of the plaintiff's claimed damages.

LAWLER v. QUINN – Attorney Jason R. Scopa for the defendant - Verdict April 25, 2005
Defendant rear-ended the plaintiff on a highway. Defendant plead guilty to a drunk driving charge. At civil trial, defendant admitted liability. Plaintiff alleged numerous personal injuries from the accident, including herniated lumbar and cervical discs, aggravation of preexisting depression and psychiatric disorders. Plaintiff submitted special damages of approximately $27,000.00. Verdict only $28,153.00 after an offset and an interest calculation.

OWEN v. DURAN
Plaintiff had a six-figure settlement demand and, after trial, obtained jury verdict on November 8, 2004. Plaintiff alleged that defendant turned left into her travel lane and caused the two-car accident. Plaintiff alleged numerous injuries, including a bone growth on the back of her hand, carpal tunnel syndrome requiring surgery, and shoulder and neck injuries. Plaintiff submitted special damages of approximately $38,000. Jury found the plaintiff 15% at fault. Verdict for plaintiff - $15,224.00 - after offsets and an interest calculation.
When you are facing loss due to the actions or inactions of another person, call us and get a FREE initial consultation on personal injury!
781-233-2284
Defending your rights is our goal. Trust our team if you are accused of damages or are the victim.

Get the consultation you need to know the answers to your questions. Let us provide you with accurate, fair, and quality information to help you to make the right decisions for your future.
Share by: